Randomized controlled trial of bipolar diathermy vs ultrasonic scalpel for closed hemorrhoidectomy

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 3, Issue 10

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

All Articles published online

Item

Count

PDF

365

HTML

3300

Figures (1-1)

242

Tables (1-4)

224

Sum=4131

Oct 27, 2011 (publication date) through Mar 10, 2025

Times Cited of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

ISSN

1948-9366

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Brief Article

World J Gastrointest Surg. Oct 27, 2011; 3(10): 147-152
Published online Oct 27, 2011. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v3.i10.147

Table 1 Characteristics of patients randomized to group 1 (bipolar diathermy) or group 2 (ultrasonic scalpel) for closed hemorrhoidectomy

Citation: Tsunoda A, Sada H, Sugimoto T, Kano N, Kawana M, Sasaki T, Hashimoto H. Randomized controlled trial of bipolar diathermy vs ultrasonic scalpel for closed hemorrhoidectomy. World J Gastrointest Surg 2011; 3(10): 147-152
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v3/i10/147.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v3.i10.147