Copyright
©2010 Baishideng.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jun 27, 2010; 2(6): 210-216
Published online Jun 27, 2010. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v2.i6.210
Published online Jun 27, 2010. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v2.i6.210
Table 1 NOTES prototype specifications
Prototype | Paradigm | Working Length (cm) | Channels/Size (mm) | Diameter (mm) | Visualization | Positioning mechanism | Specializations | Procedures performed |
DCE (EGD/Colonoscope) | Endoscopic | 103/168 | Two: 3.7, 2.8/Two: 3.7, 3.2 | 12.6/13.7 | Standard endoscopic | Standard scope shaft | Two small parallel channels | Animal and human NOTES (Hybrid procedures) |
NOTES scope | Endoscopic | 133 | Two: 2.8, 2.8 | 14.3 | Standard endoscopic | Two bending segments, one lockable | Dual bending segments, orthogonal lifting gates | Animal hybrid NOTES |
IOP | Endoscopic/Flexible-laparoscopic | 110 | Four: 7, 6, 4, 4 | 18 | N-scope | Built in shaft-stiffening system | 2.5cm gasping forceps with tissue anchors | Human NOTES, endoluminal bariatrics, anti-reflux procedures |
EndoSAMURAI | Flexible-laparoscopic | 103 | Three: 2.8, 2.8, 2.8 | 15.7 | Endoscopic | Uses a stiffening overtube system | Bimanual control enables 5 degrees of freedom for 2 end effectors | Animal NOTES |
DDES | Flexible-laparoscopic | 55 | Three: 7, 4.2, 4.2 | 16 × 22 | N-scope | Articulating guide sheath | Bimanual control with 7 degrees of freedom for 2 end effectors | Bench top EMR, ESD and skills assessment models |
- Citation: Shaikh SN, Thompson CC. Natural orifice translumenal surgery: Flexible platform review. World J Gastrointest Surg 2010; 2(6): 210-216
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v2/i6/210.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v2.i6.210