Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Apr 27, 2025; 17(4): 104187
Published online Apr 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i4.104187
Published online Apr 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i4.104187
Table 3 Hazard ratios of baseline effective tumor volume, absolute effective tumor volume change, and effective tumor volume% with and without magnetic resonance bias field correction
Variable | Not using bias field correction | Use bias field correction | ||
Hazard ratio | P value | Hazard ratio | P value | |
Baseline ETV | 1.063 (1.031-1.095) | < 0.001 | 1.165 (1.069-1.268) | < 0.001 |
Absolute ETV change | 1.012 (0.985-1.042) | 0.481 | 1.040 (0.935-1.160) | 0.512 |
ETV% | 1.005 (0.981-1.030) | 0.793 | 0.665 (0.538-0.825) | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Liu K, Li JB, Wang Y, Li Y. Magnetic resonance imaging bias field correction improves tumor prognostic evaluation after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for liver cancer. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(4): 104187
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i4/104187.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i4.104187