Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Apr 27, 2025; 17(4): 102442
Published online Apr 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i4.102442
Published online Apr 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i4.102442
Table 1 Comparison of general data between the two groups of patients
Control group (n = 50) | Research group (n = 50) | P value | |
Gender (male/female) | 27/23 | 30/20 | 0.5445 |
Age | 57.36 ± 8.02 | 58.76 ± 7.23 | 0.8333 |
Tumor site | 0.7205 | ||
Rectum | 12 | 15 | |
Sigmoid colon | 28 | 25 | |
Ascending colon | 5 | 7 | |
Descending colon | 5 | 3 | |
Tumor diameter | 2.51 ± 0.48 | 2.42 ± 0.56 | 0.8429 |
TNM stage | 0.8462 | ||
Stage I | 18 | 17 | |
Stage II | 26 | 25 | |
Stage III | 6 | 8 |
- Citation: Li WB, Li J, Yu W, Gao JH. Short-term efficacy of laparoscopic radical resection for colorectal cancer and risk of unplanned reoperation after surgery. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(4): 102442
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i4/102442.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i4.102442