Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing extraperitoneal and transperitoneal routes of colostomy-related complications

doi:10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.98947

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 17, Issue 3

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (0)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, HTML series, Figures (1-8) series, Tables (1-2) series.

Item

Count

PDF

HTML

Figures (1-8)

Tables (1-2)

Sum=0

Mar 27, 2025 (publication date) through Feb 24, 2025

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (0)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

ISSN

1948-9366

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Systematic Reviews

World J Gastrointest Surg. Mar 27, 2025; 17(3): 98947
Published online Mar 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.98947

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 2 Forest plot of operation time and blood loss. A: Operation time; B: Blood loss after laparoscopic approach. EPC: Extraperitoneal colostomy; TPC: Transperitoneal colostomy.

Citation: Isah AD, Wang X, Shaibu Z, Yuan X, Dang SC. Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing extraperitoneal and transperitoneal routes of colostomy-related complications. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(3): 98947
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i3/98947.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.98947