Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Mar 27, 2025; 17(3): 95704
Published online Mar 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.95704
Published online Mar 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.95704
Table 4 Comparison of surgical conditions between the two groups of patients
Group | Wound closure time (min) | Number of titanium clips used (pcs) | Number of fasting days (days) | Length of postoperative hospital stay (days) | Need for an indwelling gastric tube [n (%)] |
Preclosure group (n = 54) | 6.69 ± 2.10 | 8.93 ± 2.23 | 3.61 ± 0.78 | 6.41 ± 1.31 | 9 (16.7) |
Non-preclosure group (n = 40) | 11.65 ± 3.78 | 12.05 ± 4.49 | 3.73 ± 0.84 | 6.13 ± 1.06 | 13 (32.5) |
χ2/t value | 7.479 | 4.043 | 0.672 | 1.116 | 3.213 |
P value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.504 | 0.267 | 0.073 |
- Citation: Zu QQ, You Y, Chen AZ, Wang XR, Zhang SH, Chen FL, Liu M. Combined application of the preclosure technique and traction approach facilitates endoscopic full-thickness resection of gastric submucosal tumors. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(3): 95704
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i3/95704.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.95704