Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Mar 27, 2025; 17(3): 95704
Published online Mar 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.95704
Published online Mar 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.95704
Table 1 Comparison of the baseline data of patients in the preclosure and non-preclosure groups
Group | Sex (patients) | Age (years) (mean ± SD) | Hypertension (cases) | Diabetes mellitus (case) | History of abdominal surgery (case) | |
Male | Female | |||||
Preclosure group | 22 | 32 | 57.13 ± 10.37 | 13 | 2 | 14 |
Non-preclosure group | 16 | 24 | 54.18 ± 8.44 | 6 | 3 | 9 |
χ2/t value | 0.005 | 1.475 | 1.173 | 0.120 | 0.146 | |
P value | 0.942 | 0.144 | 0.279 | 0.729 | 0.702 |
- Citation: Zu QQ, You Y, Chen AZ, Wang XR, Zhang SH, Chen FL, Liu M. Combined application of the preclosure technique and traction approach facilitates endoscopic full-thickness resection of gastric submucosal tumors. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(3): 95704
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i3/95704.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.95704