Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Mar 27, 2025; 17(3): 103740
Published online Mar 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.103740
Table 1 Summary of neoadjuvant locoregional therapy studies in hepatocellular carcinoma in the last five years
Disease
HCC stage/liver function
Treatment arms (n)
Neoadjuvant duration (weeks)
Preoperative stopping time (weeks)
Median follow-up (months)
Primary endpoints findings
Ref.
Resectable HCCBCLC A/B exceeding the Milan criteriaNeoadjuvant TACE (82) vs direct surgery (82)4-6NA361-year OS (97.2% vs 82.4%); 2-year OS (88.4% vs 60.4%); 3-year OS (71.6% vs 45.7%; P = 0.0011)Fang et al[11]
Resectable HCC (> 5 cm)NANeoadjuvant TACE (60) vs direct surgery (324)NANA24DFS (P = 0.935); OS (P = 0.172)Giannone et al[12]
Resectable HCC (> 5 cm)Child-Pugh A/BNeoadjuvant TACE (30) vs Direct surgery (30)12NA242-year DFS (P = 0.7045)Kobayashi et al[13]
Resectable HCC with PVTTChild-Pugh ANeoadjuvant HAIC (65) vs direct surgery (55)9.6 NA361-year OS (94.9% vs 84.6%); 3-year OS (78% vs 47.6%); 5-year OS (66.4% vs 37.2%; P < 0.001)Hu et al[16]
Centrally located resectable HCCChild-Pugh ANeoadjuvant IMRT (41) vs direct surgery (121)5-64-12451-year OS (95% vs 82%); 3-year OS (70% vs 64%); 5-year OS (70% vs 54%; P = 0.0099); 1-year DFS (71% vs 52%); 3-year DFS (53% vs 38%); 5-year DFS (37% vs 34%; P = 0.034)Wei et al[19]
A single and small (≤ 5 cm) HBV-related resectable HCCBCLC ANeoadjuvant IMRT (30) vs direct surgery (30)NA468DFS (P = 0.448)Salem et al[20]