Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Mar 27, 2025; 17(3): 102543
Published online Mar 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.102543
Table 1 Prior feeding tube experience and motivations for Roux-en-Y jejunostomy
Case
Age/sex
Previous feeding tubes
Reason (s) for procedure
172 malesNJTRecurrent NJT blockage and persistent nasal/throat irritation
Nasal/throat irritation, recurrent blockage, kinking
PEG
Recurrent infections
222 femalesNJTLess social stigma as is more discrete; long term solution to maintaining weight
Recurrent sinus infection, nasal bleeding
Social stigma - people constantly staring
327 femalesNJTOptimise nutrition; medication administration; persistent throat/nasal irritation from NJT
Nasal ulceration/wounds
Throat irritation
Recurrent blockage
Social stigma
PEG
Hypergranulation tissue
418 femalesNJTPersistent nausea/vomiting; less social stigma; optimise nutrition
Nasal/throat irritation
Social stigma
528 femalesNJTOptimise nutrition; improve symptoms
Recurrent “flipping”
Nasal/throat irritation
PEG
Dislodgement causing gastric perforation and multiple operations
628 femalesNJTPersistent nausea/vomiting; optimise nutrition
Nasal/throat irritation
Blockage
PEG
Leakage
Feeding jejunostomy
Leakage
731 femalesNJTOptimise nutrition; less leakage and dislodgement
Recurrent blockage
Dislodgement
PEG-J
Feed reflux
Leakage
Jejunal extension dislodgement
826 malesNJTOptimise nutrition; reduce leakage and pain
Recurrent sinus infection
Dislodgement
Social stigma
PEG-J
Balloon displacement
Pain
Leakage