Endoscopic full-thickness resection vs surgical resection for gastric stromal tumors: Efficacy and safety using propensity score matching

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 17, Issue 3

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

All Articles published online

Item

Count

PDF

HTML

Figures (1-4)

Tables (1-3)

Sum=0

Mar 27, 2025 (publication date) through Feb 24, 2025

Times Cited of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

ISSN

1948-9366

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Retrospective Cohort Study

World J Gastrointest Surg. Mar 27, 2025; 17(3): 101002
Published online Mar 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.101002

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 1 Flow diagram of the study. GIST: Gastrointestinal stromal tumor; EFTR: Endoscopic full-thickness resection.

Citation: Zhao SQ, Wang SY, Ge N, Guo JT, Liu X, Wang GX, Su L, Sun SY, Wang S. Endoscopic full-thickness resection vs surgical resection for gastric stromal tumors: Efficacy and safety using propensity score matching. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(3): 101002
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i3/101002.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.101002