Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Mar 27, 2025; 17(3): 100302
Published online Mar 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.100302
Published online Mar 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.100302
Table 3 Comparison of postoperative complication rates between the two groups, n (%)
Complication | QASN group (n = 68) | RN group (n = 72) | P value |
Incision infection | 2 (2.94) | 3 (4.17) | - |
Pulmonary infection | 0 (0.00) | 2 (2.78) | - |
Intestinal obstruction | 1 (1.47) | 1 (1.39) | - |
Anastomotic fistula | 1 (1.47) | 1 (1.39) | - |
Uroschesis | 0 (0.00) | 2 (2.78) | - |
Urinary tract infection | 1 (1.47) | 1 (1.39) | - |
Postoperative bleeding | 0 (0.00) | 1(1.39) | - |
Deep vein thrombosis | 0 (0.00) | 1 (1.39) | - |
Malnutrition | 0 (0.00) | 2 (2.78) | - |
Total | 5 (7.35) | 14 (19.44) | 0.041 |
- Citation: Tan XQ, Huang XL. Effects of postoperative quantitative assessment strategy-based nursing in patients with colorectal cancer. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(3): 100302
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i3/100302.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.100302