Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Mar 27, 2025; 17(3): 100143
Published online Mar 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.100143
Published online Mar 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.100143
Table 4 Comparison of long-term prognosis follow-up survey among three groups of patients, n (%)
Group | Cases (n) | 6 months post-discharge | 1 year after discharge | 2 years after discharge |
Control | 40 | 36 (90.00) | 28 (70.00) | 22 (55.00) |
Open surgery | 25 | 24 (96.00) | 23 (92.00) | 20 (80.00) |
Laparoscopic surgery | 45 | 44 (97.78) | 41 (91.11) | 34 (75.56) |
Control and open χ2/P value | 0.780/0.377 | 4.406/0.035 | 4.205/0.040 | |
Control and laparoscopic χ2/P value | 2.313/0.128 | 6.176/0.012 | 3.980/0.046 | |
Open and laparoscopic χ2/P value | 0.183/0.668 | 0.016/0.898 | 0.180/0.671 |
- Citation: Zhu LL, Shen RZ. Follow-up of elderly gastric cancer post-radical surgery: Trauma, complications, and prognosis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(3): 100143
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i3/100143.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.100143