Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Mar 27, 2025; 17(3): 100143
Published online Mar 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.100143
Published online Mar 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.100143
Table 3 Comparison of complication incidence rates among three groups of patients, n (%)
Groups | Cases | Anastomotic fistula | Incision infection | Pulmonary infection | Dumping syndrome | Abdominal infection | Total incidence |
Control | 40 | 2 (5.00) | 3 (7.50) | 0 (0) | 1 (2.50) | 2 (5.00) | 8 (20.00) |
Open surgery | 25 | 3 (12.00) | 4 (16.00) | 1 (4.00) | 2 (8.00) | 4 (16.00) | 14 (56.00) |
Laparoscopic surgery | 45 | 7 (15.56) | 1 (2.22) | 0 (0) | 5 (11.11) | 5 (11.11) | 18 (40.00) |
Control and laparoscopic group χ2/P value | 8.904/0.002 | ||||||
Control and laparoscopic group χ2/P value | 3.989/0.045 | ||||||
Control and laparoscopic χ2/P value | 1.657/0.197 |
- Citation: Zhu LL, Shen RZ. Follow-up of elderly gastric cancer post-radical surgery: Trauma, complications, and prognosis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(3): 100143
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i3/100143.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.100143