Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Feb 27, 2025; 17(2): 98535
Published online Feb 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i2.98535
Table 4 Postoperative pathologic data were analyzed, n (%)
Variable
Patients with dysphagia (n = 18)
Patients without dysphagia (n = 97)
P value
Msi1 (5.6)4 (4.1)0.784
Her2+2 (11.1)10 (10.3)0.919
Pathology type of tumor--0.803
Adenocarcinoma17 (94.4)86 (88.7)-
Signet-ring cell carcinoma1 (5.6)6 (6.2)-
Neuroendocrine tumor01 (1.0)-
Low adhesion carcinoma04 (4.1)-
The longest diameter of the tumor (cm) mean ± SD3.16 ± 1.774.40 ± 2.660.058
Tumor location0.925
Upper2 (11.1)13 (13.4)-
Middle4 (22.2)24 (24.7)-
Lower12 (66.7)60 (61.9)-
Tumor differentiation0.117
Poor14 (77.8)75 (77.3)-
Moderate-poor2 (11.1)20 (20.6)-
Medium2 (11.1)2 (2.1)-
The pT category0.461
< T21 (5.6)11 (11.3)-
T2-T4a17 (94.4)86 (88.7)-
The pN category0.087
09 (50.0)34 (35.1)-
15 (27.8)11 (11.3)-
23 (16.7)19 (19.6)-
31 (5.6)33 (34.0)-