Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Feb 27, 2025; 17(2): 101897
Published online Feb 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i2.101897
Published online Feb 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i2.101897
Table 1 Difference analysis between high recurrence risk group and low recurrence risk group
Variables | Total (n = 90) | LRR group (n = 53) | HRR group (n = 37) | Statistic | P value |
Age (year), mean ± SD | 64.92 ± 10.44 | 64.66 ± 10.98 | 65.30 ± 9.75 | t = -0.28 | 0.778 |
Sex, n (%) | χ² = 1.79 | 0.180 | |||
Female | 29 (32.22) | 20 (37.74) | 9 (24.32) | - | - |
Male | 61 (67.78) | 33 (62.26) | 28 (75.68) | - | - |
BMI, mean ± SD | 25.31 ± 2.90 | 25.08 ± 2.90 | 25.63 ± 2.92 | t = -0.88 | 0.380 |
Smoking, n (%) | χ² = 0.37 | 0.541 | |||
No | 65 (72.22) | 37 (69.81) | 28 (75.68) | - | - |
Yes | 25 (27.78) | 16 (30.19) | 9 (24.32) | - | - |
Drinking, n (%) | χ² = 0.11 | 0.737 | |||
No | 59 (65.56) | 34 (64.15) | 25 (67.57) | - | - |
Yes | 31 (34.44) | 19 (35.85) | 12 (32.43) | - | - |
Family history, n (%) | χ² = 0.00 | 1.000 | |||
No | 80 (88.89) | 47 (88.68) | 33 (89.19) | - | - |
Yes | 10 (11.11) | 6 (11.32) | 4 (10.81) | - | - |
Complication, n (%) | χ² = 0.32 | 0.571 | |||
No | 47 (52.22) | 29 (54.72) | 18 (48.65) | - | - |
Yes | 43 (47.78) | 24 (45.28) | 19 (51.35) | - | - |
MTL, mean ± SD | 3.98 ± 1.29 | 3.82 ± 1.30 | 4.22 ± 1.25 | t = -1.48 | 0.141 |
Tumor location, n (%) | χ² = 0.48 | 0.787 | |||
Low | 32 (35.56) | 20 (37.74) | 12 (32.43) | - | - |
Median | 39 (43.33) | 23 (43.40) | 16 (43.24) | - | - |
High | 19 (21.11) | 10 (18.87) | 9 (24.32) | - | - |
MrT staging, n (%) | χ² = 2.81 | 0.094 | |||
I or II | 46 (51.11) | 31 (58.49) | 15 (40.54) | - | - |
III or IV | 44 (48.89) | 22 (41.51) | 22 (59.46) | - | - |
MrN staging, n (%) | χ² = 4.43 | 0.035 | |||
0 or I | 46 (51.11) | 32 (60.38) | 14 (37.84) | - | - |
II or III | 44 (48.89) | 21 (39.62) | 23 (62.16) | - | - |
CRM, n (%) | χ² = 8.25 | 0.004 | |||
Negative | 38 (42.22) | 29 (54.72) | 9 (24.32) | - | - |
Positive | 52 (57.78) | 24 (45.28) | 28 (75.68) | - | - |
EMVI, n (%) | - | - | - | χ² = 4.50 | 0.034 |
Negative | 60 (66.67) | 40 (75.47) | 20 (54.05) | - | - |
Positive | 30 (33.33) | 13 (24.53) | 17 (45.95) | - | - |
CEA, mean ± SD | 40.08 ± 11.25 | 35.57 ± 9.31 | 46.55 ± 10.71 | t = -5.17 | < 0.001 |
CA125, mean ± SD | 11.72 ± 5.25 | 11.07 ± 5.28 | 12.66 ± 5.13 | t = -1.42 | 0.160 |
CA199, mean ± SD | 56.58 ± 11.18 | 50.44 ± 7.85 | 65.39 ± 9.19 | t = -8.29 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Wu L, Zhu JJ, Liang XH, Tong H, Song Y. Predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging parameters combined with tumor markers for rectal cancer recurrence risk after surgery. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(2): 101897
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i2/101897.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i2.101897