Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Feb 27, 2025; 17(2): 101896
Published online Feb 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i2.101896
Published online Feb 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i2.101896
Characteristic | Simple closure (n = 40) | Omental patch (n = 40) | Partial gastrectomy (n = 40) | P value |
Age (years) | 51.8 ± 14.9 | 53.2 ± 15.7 | 53.1 ± 15.4 | 0.89 |
Sex (male/female) | 30/10 | 28/12 | 29/11 | 0.88 |
BMI (kg/m²) | 24.3 ± 3.7 | 24.7 ± 3.5 | 24.1 ± 3.9 | 0.75 |
Diabetes mellitus | 8 (20) | 7 (17.5) | 9 (22.5) | 0.86 |
Hypertension | 12 (30) | 14 (35) | 13 (32.5) | 0.89 |
Smoking history | 18 (45) | 20 (50) | 19 (47.5) | 0.90 |
ASA score (I/II/III) | 12/22/6 | 14/20/6 | 11/23/6 | 0.95 |
Duration of symptoms (hour) | 14.2 ± 6.8 | 13.8 ± 7.1 | 15.1 ± 6.5 | 0.67 |
- Citation: Pang YF, Shu L, Xia CW. Retrospective comparative study of different surgical methods for gastric ulcer perforation: Efficacy and postoperative complications. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(2): 101896
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i2/101896.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i2.101896