Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jan 27, 2025; 17(1): 101204
Published online Jan 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i1.101204
Published online Jan 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i1.101204
Table 3 Comparison of postoperative complications between the two groups of patients, n (%)
Item | Postoperative complications | Total | |||||
Anastomotic leak | Intra-abdominal bleeding | Pleural effusion | Anastomotic stenosis | Intestinal obstruction | Wound infection | ||
LPG-DCA (n = 33) | 3 (9.0) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (6.0) | 1 (3.0) | 1 (3.0) | 0 (0.0) | 7 (21.2) |
LPG-TGA (n = 30) | 2 (6.7) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (3.3) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (6.7) | 1 (3.3) | 6 (20.0) |
χ2 value | 0.014 | ||||||
P value | 0.905 |
- Citation: Wang M, Zhang LL, Wang G, Miao YC, Zhang T, Qiu L, Fang GD, Lu F, Xu DL, Yu P. Comparative study of clinical efficacy of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-channel anastomosis and tubular gastroesophageal anastomosis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(1): 101204
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i1/101204.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i1.101204