Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jan 27, 2025; 17(1): 100364
Published online Jan 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i1.100364
Published online Jan 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i1.100364
Table 4 Comparison of complications, n (%)
| Groups | LapTME group (n = 44) | TaTME group (n = 50) | χ2 | P value |
| Anastomotic bleeding | 3 (6.82) | 2 (4.00) | ||
| Anastomotic fistula | 1 (2.27) | 1 (2.00) | ||
| Ileus | 3 (6.82) | 2 (4.00) | ||
| Incision infection | 1 (2.27) | 0 (0.00) | ||
| Total occurrence | 8 (18.18) | 5 (10.00) | 1.315 | 0.252 |
- Citation: Lu F, Tan SG, Zuo J, Jiang HH, Wang JH, Jiang YP. Comparative efficacy analysis of laparoscopic-assisted transanal total mesorectal excision vs laparoscopic transanal mesorectal excision for low-lying rectal cancer. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(1): 100364
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i1/100364.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i1.100364