Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Aug 27, 2024; 16(8): 2612-2619
Published online Aug 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i8.2612
Published online Aug 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i8.2612
Table 1 Comparisons of general data and tumor status between the two groups
EGP group | IGP group | Statistics | P value | |
Age (years) | 54.9 ± 11.4 | 54.6 ± 12.9 | t = 0.103 | 0.919 |
Sex (male/female) | 16/8 | 17/8 | χ2 = 0.01 | 0.921 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 23.5 ± 1.8 | 24.4 ± 2.2 | t = 1.642 | 0.107 |
ASA grade (I-II) | 17/7 | 21/4 | χ2 = 1.219 | 0.26 |
Child-Pugh class (A/B) | 16/8 | 16/9 | χ2 = 0.038 | 0.845 |
Tumor diameters (cm) | 4.46 ± 0.83 | 4.20 ± 0.68 | t = 1.150 | 0.256 |
HBsAg (negative/positive) | 8/16 | 5/20 | χ2 = 1.117 | 0.291 |
- Citation: Kang LM, Xu L, Zhang FW, Yu FK, Lang L. Efficiency and safety of laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy: A study of intrathecal vs extrathecal Glissonean pedicle techniques. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16(8): 2612-2619
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v16/i8/2612.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i8.2612