Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jul 27, 2024; 16(7): 2012-2022
Published online Jul 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i7.2012
Published online Jul 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i7.2012
Group | Cases | Reflux esophagitis | Anastomotic stenosis | Intestinal obstruction | Delayed gastric emptying | ||||
Total | A | B | C | D | |||||
Dual channel matching group | 50 | 2 (4.0) | 2 (4.0) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 (12.0) | 1 (2.0) | 0 |
Tubular gastroesophageal anastomosis group | 49 | 13 (26.5) | 6 (12.2) | 5 (10.2) | 1 (2.0) | 1 (2.0) | 12 (24.5) | 0 | 2 (4.1) |
Statistical value | χ2 = 13.507 | Z = 3.177 | χ2 = 2.595 | χ2 < 0.001 | χ2 = 0.531 | ||||
P value | 0.009 | 0.001 | 0.107 | > 0.999 | 0.466 |
- Citation: Liu BY, Wu S, Xu Y. Clinical efficacy and safety of double-channel anastomosis and tubular gastroesophageal anastomosis in gastrectomy. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16(7): 2012-2022
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v16/i7/2012.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i7.2012