Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jul 27, 2024; 16(7): 2012-2022
Published online Jul 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i7.2012
Published online Jul 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i7.2012
Table 2 Comparison of intraoperative and postoperative conditions between the two groups
| Group | Cases | Surgical methods | Intraoperative bleeding volume (mL) | Number of lymph nodes resected | Operative time (h) | Hospital stay (d) | Short-term complications after anastomotic surgery (%) | ||||||
| Laparoscopic | Open | Total | Anastomotic bleeding | Anastomotic leakage | Gastroparesis | Pneumonia | Infect | ||||||
| Dual-channel anastomosis group | 50 | 16 (32.0) | 34 (68.0) | 200 (100, 300) | 17 (15, 21) | 4 (3, 4) | 16 (15, 18) | 5 (10.0) | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Tubular gastroesophageal anastomosis group | 49 | 10 (20.4) | 39 (79.6) | 200 (100, 200) | 20 (16, 25) | 3.6 (3.1, 4.0) | 14 (13, 18) | 4 (8.2) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Statistics | χ2 = 1.717 | Z = 0.245 | Z = 1.866 | Z = 0.102 | Z = 1.463 | χ2 = 0.101 | |||||||
| P value | 0.19 | 0.807 | 0.062 | 0.918 | 0.144 | 0.751 | |||||||
- Citation: Liu BY, Wu S, Xu Y. Clinical efficacy and safety of double-channel anastomosis and tubular gastroesophageal anastomosis in gastrectomy. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16(7): 2012-2022
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v16/i7/2012.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i7.2012