Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jun 27, 2024; 16(6): 1681-1690
Published online Jun 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i6.1681
Published online Jun 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i6.1681
TNM staging | Phase I | Phase II | Phase III | |||||
Number of cases | % | Number of cases | % | Number of cases | % | Number of cases | % | |
Disease-free survival | 83 | 74.1 | 25 | 89.3 | 37 | 84.1 | 21 | 52.5 |
109 | 85.2 | 30 | 93.8 | 44 | 88 | 35 | 76.1 | |
4.962 | 0.403 | 0.323 | 5.799 | |||||
0.026 | 0.525 | 0.57 | 0.016 | |||||
Total survival | 91 | 81.3 | 26 | 92.9 | 39 | 88.6 | 26 | 65 |
117 | 91.4 | 31 | 96.9 | 47 | 94 | 39 | 84.8 | |
5.494 | 0.499 | 0.852 | 4.787 | |||||
0.019 | 0.48 | 0.356 | 0.029 |
- Citation: Gao WG, Shi W, Gong XC, Li ZW, Tuoheti Y. Comparative analysis of the short and medium-term efficacy of the Da Vinci robot versus laparoscopic total mesangectomy for rectal cancer. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16(6): 1681-1690
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v16/i6/1681.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i6.1681