Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jun 27, 2024; 16(6): 1681-1690
Published online Jun 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i6.1681
Published online Jun 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i6.1681
Pathological indicators | L-TME group (n = 112) | R-TME group (n = 128) | Statistical | P value |
Number of lymph nodes dissected | 12 (7) | 16 (8) | Z = -3.295 | 0.001 |
Tumor diameter (cm) | 4.0 (1.5) | 3.5 (2.4) | Z = -0.006 | 0.996 |
Pathological grading | χ2 = 0.607 | 0.738 | ||
High differentiation | 5 | 8 | ||
Medium differentiation | 95 | 104 | ||
Low differentiation | 12 | 16 | ||
Positive circumcision margin (case) | 8 | 2 | χ2 = 4.658 | 0.031 |
AJCC staging | χ2 = 0.002 | 0.999 | ||
Phase I | 28 | 32 | ||
Phase II | 44 | 50 | ||
Phase III | 40 | 46 | ||
Mesorectal resection (case) | χ2 = 5.060 | 0.08 | ||
completely | 104 | 126 | ||
Near-complete | 6 | 2 | ||
Imperfection | 2 | 0 | ||
Nerve invasion | 23 | 18 | χ2 = 1.767 | 0.184 |
Vascular invasion | 25 | 20 | χ2 = 1.758 | 0.185 |
- Citation: Gao WG, Shi W, Gong XC, Li ZW, Tuoheti Y. Comparative analysis of the short and medium-term efficacy of the Da Vinci robot versus laparoscopic total mesangectomy for rectal cancer. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16(6): 1681-1690
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v16/i6/1681.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i6.1681