Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage vs percutaneous transhepatic bile duct drainage in the management of malignant obstructive jaundice

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 16, Issue 6

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

All Articles published online

Item

Count

PDF

HTML

672

Figures (1-1)

167

Tables (1-4)

121

Sum=994

Publishing Process of This Article

Item

Count

Browse

Download

Sum=2

Jun 27, 2024 (publication date) through Jan 26, 2025

Times Cited of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

ISSN

1948-9366

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Retrospective Study

World J Gastrointest Surg. Jun 27, 2024; 16(6): 1592-1600
Published online Jun 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i6.1592

Table 3 Comparison of surgical success rates and clinical response rates between the two subgroups, n (%)

EUS-BD: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage; PTBD: Percutaneous transhepatic puncture biliary drainage.

Citation: Zhu QQ, Chen BF, Yang Y, Zuo XY, Liu WH, Wang TT, Zhang Y. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage vs percutaneous transhepatic bile duct drainage in the management of malignant obstructive jaundice. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16(6): 1592-1600
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v16/i6/1592.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i6.1592