Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Apr 27, 2024; 16(4): 1109-1120
Published online Apr 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i4.1109
Published online Apr 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i4.1109
Figure 4 Postoperative angiography of the two groups of patients.
A-D: Double-tract reconstruction: Imaging of contrast agent in esophagus (A), the contrast agent passed through the esophagojejunal anastomosis smoothly (B), the contrast agent successfully passed through the duodenal jejunum anastomosis (C), and imaging of contrast agent in distal jejunum (D); E-H: Roux-en-Y reconstruction: Imaging of contrast agent in esophagus (E), the contrast agent passed through the esophagojejunal anastomosis smoothly (F), imaging of contrast agent in proximal jejunum (G), and imaging of contrast agent in distal jejunum (H).
- Citation: Dong TX, Wang D, Zhao Q, Zhang ZD, Zhao XF, Tan BB, Liu Y, Liu QW, Yang PG, Ding PA, Zheng T, Li Y, Liu ZJ. Comparative analysis of two digestive tract reconstruction methods in total laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16(4): 1109-1120
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v16/i4/1109.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i4.1109