Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Feb 27, 2024; 16(2): 511-517
Published online Feb 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i2.511
Published online Feb 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i2.511
Table 4 Comparison of changes in the function of gastric mucosa between the two groups
Group | n | PG I | PG II | PG I/II | |||
Before the operation | Before the discharge | Before the operation | Before the discharge | Before the operation | Before the discharge | ||
Experimental group | 39 | 65.31 ± 12.32 | 95.36 ± 19. 26a | 23. 28 ± 2.51 | 14.20 ± 2.35a | 2.72 ± 0.31 | 5.97 ± 1.52 |
Control group | 39 | 66.38 ± 12. 48 | 75.42 ± 13.48a | 24.03 ± 3.04 | 18.05 ± 1.03a | 2.71 ± 0.29 | 4.76 ± 1.21 |
t value | 0.359 | 153.313 | 0.728 | 6.706 | 0.000 | 12.832 | |
P value | 0.501 | 0.001 | 0.342 | 0.001 | 1.000 | 0.001 |
- Citation: Xu WS, Zhang HY, Jin S, Zhang Q, Liu HD, Wang MT, Zhang B. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer and precancerous lesions in elderly patients. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16(2): 511-517
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v16/i2/511.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i2.511