Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jan 27, 2024; 16(1): 205-214
Published online Jan 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i1.205
Published online Jan 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i1.205
Table 1 Commutatively comparative efficacy of different interventions for overall survival
| Log odds ratio (95%CI) | ||||
| SBRT | IMRT | 3D-CRT | Surgery | |
| SBRT | - | -0.8913 (-4.685, 1.333) | -1.241 (-4.957, 0.9864) | -2.38 (-6.083, -0.2884) |
| IMRT | 0.8913 (-1.333, 4.685) | - | -0.3267 (-1.379, 0.7683) | -1.475 (-2.325, -0.6613) |
| 3D-CRT | 1.241 (-0.9864, 4.957) | 0.3267 (-0.7683, 1.379) | - | -1.14 (-1.874, -0.5102) |
| Surgery | 2.38 (0.2884, 6.083) | 1.475 (0.6613, 2.325) | 1.14 (0.5102, 1.874) | - |
- Citation: Yang GY, He ZW, Tang YC, Yuan F, Cao MB, Ren YP, Li YX, Su XR, Yao ZC, Deng MH. Unraveling the efficacy network: A network meta-analysis of adjuvant external beam radiation therapy methods after hepatectomy. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16(1): 205-214
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v16/i1/205.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i1.205