Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Sep 27, 2023; 15(9): 1986-1994
Published online Sep 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i9.1986
Published online Sep 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i9.1986
Table 1 Comparison of operation time between two groups of patients
| Group | n | Operation time (min) | Bleeding volume (mL) | Positive rate of cutting edge (%) | Postoperative drainage time (d) | Postoperative landing time (h) | Length of stay (d) |
| A group | 70 | 168.1 ± 15.7 | 136.8 ± 36.1 | 1 (1.43) | 3.71 ± 0.84 | 27.81 ± 7.51 | 12.30 ± 2.13 |
| B group | 68 | 188.0 ± 19.3 | 188.2 ± 43.7 | 3 (4.41) | 4.40 ± 1.22 | 29.40 ± 7.82 | 13.54 ± 2.35 |
| t/χ2 | -6.653 | -7.542 | 1.091 | -3.879 | -1.218 | -3.250 | |
| P value | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.296 | 0.000 | 0.225 | 0.001 |
- Citation: Sun CB, Han XQ, Wang H, Zhang YX, Wang MC, Liu YN. Effect of two surgical approaches on the lung function and prognosis of patients with combined esophagogastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15(9): 1986-1994
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v15/i9/1986.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v15.i9.1986