Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Sep 27, 2023; 15(9): 1901-1909
Published online Sep 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i9.1901
Table 3 Comparison results between End-to-side invagination pancreatoduodenectomy and Modified duct-to-mucosa pancreatoduodenectomy, n (%)

End-to-side invagination pancreatoduodenectomy (n = 108)
Modified duct-to-mucosa pancreatoduodenectomy (n = 107)
P value
Age (yr)53.6 ± 13.755.3 ± 12.80.336
Male50 (46.3)62 (57.9)0.088
Pancreatic texture0.152
Hard51 (47.2)61 (57.0)
Soft57 (52.8)46 (43.0)
Main pancreatic duct diameter0.033a
≤ 3 mm53 (49.1)68 (63.6)
> 3 mm55 (50.9)39 (36.4)
Operative time (min)333.2 ± 48.9283.4 ± 54.2< 0.0001a
Blood loss (mL)571.4 ± 257.3538.7 ± 195.40.295
Postoperative complications
Postoperative pancreatic fistula30 (27.8)12 (11.2)0.002a
Grade A20 (18.5)7 (15.9)
Grade B7 (6.5)4 (3.7)
Grade C3 (2.8)1 (0.9)
Peritoneal infection13 (12.0)15 (13.9)0.38
Intra-abdominal hemorrhage15 (13.9)10 (9.3)0.299
Biliary fistula11 (10.2)9 (8.3)0.654
Re-operation3 (2.8)1 (0.9)0.622
Mortality2 (1.9)0 (0)0.498
Length of stay (d)16 ± 2.615.5 ± 2.80.187