Case Control Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Aug 27, 2023; 15(8): 1629-1640
Published online Aug 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i8.1629
Table 2 Characteristics of endoscopic submucosal dissection with backup surgery and laparoscopic surgery

ESD with backup surgery (n = 27)
Laparoscopic surgery (n = 94)
OR (95%CI)
P value
Age, yr, median (range) 56 (50-64)62 (52-70)1.03 (1.00-1.06)0.053
Male gender, n (%)9 (33.3)47 (50)2.00 (0.82-4.90)0.13
Tumor size, n (%)
    ≤ 2 cm16 (59.3)15 (16)1
    3-5 cm11 (40.7)54 (57.4)7.66 (2.98-19.72)< 0.001a
    > 5 cm0 (0)25 (26.6)
Tumor location, n (%)
    Upper23 (85.2)61 (64.9)1
    Middle1 (3.7)14 (14.9)3.11 (0.99-9.76)0.052
    Low3 (11.1)19 (3.2)
Layer of tumor origin, n (%)
    Submucosa0 (0)3 (3.2)-1
    Muscularis propria27 (100)91 (96.8)-
Exophytic growth, n (%)10 (37)53 (56.4)2.20 (0.91-5.3)0.08
Pathology, n (%)
    Benign11 (40.7)14 (14.9)1
    Malignant or malignant potential16 (59.3)80 (85.1)3.93 (1.51-10.21)0.005a
Procedure time, min, median (IQR)185 (150-245)130 (100-169)-< 0.001a
Length of stay, d, median (IQR)7 (7-8)6 (4-6)-< 0.001a
Clavien ≥ III complication, n (%)0 (0)3 (3.2)-0.347