Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jul 27, 2023; 15(7): 1304-1316
Published online Jul 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i7.1304
Published online Jul 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i7.1304
Figure 2 Changes in body weight eating and blood glucose in rats after surgery.
A: Body weight; B: Food intake; C: Serum glycated hemoglobin; D: Postprandial glucose; E: Random blood glucose; F: Average blood glucose level of rats within six weeks. Data are presented as means ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by two-tailed Student’s t-test or two-way analysis of variance, sleeve gastrectomy (SG) vs sham P value magnitude, aP < 0.05, bP < 0.01, cP < 0.001; distal small bowel bypass (DSIB) vs sham group P value magnitude, dP < 0.05, eP < 0.01, fP < 0.001; DSIB vs SG P value magnitude, gP < 0.05, hP < 0.01, iP < 0.001. FBG: Fasting blood glucose; FEG: Feeding glucose; GSP: Glycated serum protein.
- Citation: Luo X, Tan C, Tao F, Xu CY, Zheng ZH, Pang Q, He XA, Cao JQ, Duan JY. Differences in metabolic improvement after metabolic surgery are linked to the gut microbiota in non-obese diabetic rats. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15(7): 1304-1316
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v15/i7/1304.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v15.i7.1304