Nutritional status efficacy of early nutritional support in gastrointestinal care: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Table 2 Risk of bias and quality assessment based on Cochrane Risk of Bias V2.0

Ref.	Randomization Process	Bias from defined interventions	Data missing bias	Data measurement offset	Optional reporting	Overall bias	Weight (%)
Sun et al[11]	Low	Low	Low	Some concerns	Low	Some concerns	8
Sun et al[11]	Low	Low	Low	Low	Low	Low	8
Pragatheeswarane et al[12]	Low	Low	Low	Low	Low	Low	8
Dag et al[13]	Low	Low	Low	Low	Low	Low	8
Fujii et al[14]	Low	Low	Low	Low	Low	Low	8
Liao et al[15]	Low	Low	Low	Some concerns	Low	Some concerns	8
Mi et al[16]	Low	Low	Low	Low	Low	Some concerns	8
Mahmoodzadeh et al[17]	Low	Some concerns	Low	Some concerns	Low	Some concerns	8
Wang et al[18]	Low	Some concerns	Low	Some concerns	Low	Some concerns	8
Qiu et al[19]	Low	Low	Low	Low	Low	Low	8
Wang et al[20]	Low	Low	Low	Low	Low	Low	8
Klappenbach et al[21]	Low	Low	Low	Low	Low	Low	8
Li et al[22]	Low	Some concerns	Low	Low	Low	Some concerns	8
Zou et al[23]	Low	Low	Low	Low	Low	Low	8
Barlow et al[24]	Low	Some concerns	Low	Some concerns	Low	Some concerns	8
Klappenbach et al[21]	Low	Low	Low	Low	Low	Low	8
Li et al[22]	Low	Low	Low	Low	Low	Low	8
Zou et al[23]	Low	Some concerns	Low	Low	Low	Some concerns	8
Barlow et al[24]	Low	Low	Low	Low	Low	Low	8
Klappenbach et al[21]	Low	Low	Low	Low	Low	Low	8