Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Mar 27, 2023; 15(3): 450-470
Published online Mar 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i3.450
Table 7 Summary of the performance for all preoperative models in predicting perioperative morbidity
Ref.
Predictive model
Discrimination
Calibration
Outcome
Filip et al[36], 2015PNIAUC = 0.65HL P value (0.85)Morbidity
Filip et al[36], 2015CCI AUC = 0.59Pearson P value (0.48)Morbidity
Filip et al[36], 2015ACCIAUC = 0.61Pearson P value (0.17)Morbidity
Schröder et al[29], 2006Cologne score (2)P value ≤ 0.001Not reportedMorbidity
Lindner et al[48], 2016P value = 0.010Not reportedMorbidity
Lagarde et al[31], 2008Amsterdam score (4)AUC = 0.65HL P value (0.366)Morbidity
Grotenhuis et al[43], 2010AUC = 0.64HL P value (0.84)Morbidity
Ferguson et al[45], 2011AUC = 0.639Not statedMorbidity
Filip et al[36], 2015AUC = 0.60HL P value (0.55)Morbidity
Gray et al[53], 2020NSQIP SRC (3)AUC = 0.553“Insufficient”Morbidity
Peng et al[54], 2020AUC = 0.600O:E = 1.89Morbidity
Ravindran et al[55], 2020AUC = 0.628Not reportedMorbidity
Reeh et al[38], 2016PER scoreP ≤ 0.001Not reportedMorbidity
Wan et al[41], 2022RAI-AAUC = 0.54Not reportedMorbidity
Wan et al[41], 20225 Factor MFIAUC = 0.57Not reportedMorbidity
Wan et al[41], 2022RAI-revisedAUC = 0.54Not reportedMorbidity
Wan et al[41], 2022RAI-revised (CC)AUC = 0.51Not reportedMorbidity