Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Mar 27, 2023; 15(3): 440-449
Published online Mar 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i3.440
Published online Mar 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i3.440
EMR-dB (n = 25) | ESD (n = 25) | P value | |
Histological complete resection, n (%) | 25 (100) | 25 (100) | > 0.99 |
En bloc resection, n (%) | 25 (100) | 25 (100) | > 0.99 |
Resection time (min) | 6.28 ± 0.75 | 14.30 ± 1.51 | < 0.001 |
Delayed bleeding perforation | 0 | 2 | 0.470 |
Perforation | 0 | 0 | > 0.99 |
Devices cost | $ 494.04 ± $ 85.47 | $ 808.98 ± $ 143.67 | < 0.001 |
Histopathological classification | > 0.99 | ||
NET G1, n (%) | 25 (100) | 25 (100) | |
NET G2 | 0 | 0 | |
NET G3 | 0 | 0 | |
NEC | 0 | 0 | |
Recurrence follow-up | 0 | 0 | > 0.99 |
- Citation: Huang JL, Gan RY, Chen ZH, Gao RY, Li DF, Wang LS, Yao J. Endoscopic mucosal resection with double band ligation versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15(3): 440-449
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v15/i3/440.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v15.i3.440