Clinical features of acute esophageal mucosal lesions and reflux esophagitis Los Angeles classification grade D: A retrospective study

doi:10.4240/wjgs.v15.i3.408

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 15, Issue 3

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (2882)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-6) series, Tables (1-5) series.

Item

Count

PDF

128

WORD

HTML

1657

Figures (1-6)

299

Tables (1-5)

224

Sum=2357

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

126

Download

399

Sum=525

Mar 27, 2023 (publication date) through Dec 25, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (0)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

ISSN

1948-9366

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Retrospective Study

World J Gastrointest Surg. Mar 27, 2023; 15(3): 408-419
Published online Mar 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i3.408

Table 4 Need for endoscopic hemostasis and endoscopic findings, n (%)

	AEML (n = 105)		RE-D (n = 48)	Risk ratio (95%CI)	P value
	Black esophagus (n = 19)	Non-black esophagus (n = 86)	RE-D (n = 48)	Risk ratio (95%CI)	P value
Need of endoscopic hemostasis	6 (5.7)		11 (22.9)	0.25 (0.10–0.63)	0.004
Need of endoscopic hemostasis	0 (0.0)	6 (7.0)
Hiatus hernia	77/103 (74.8)		46/47 (97.9)	0.76 (0.68–0.86)	< 0.001
Hiatus hernia	14/18 (77.8)	64/85 (74.4)
Gastric atrophy	39 (36.8)		15 (31.2)	1.19 (0.73–1.94)	0.586
Gastric atrophy	5 (26.3)	34 (39.1)
Gastric ulcer	31 (29.2)		1 (2.1)	14.17 (1.99–100.79)	< 0.001
Gastric ulcer	8 (42.1)	23 (26.4)
Duodenal ulcer	21 (19.8)		3 (6.2)	3.20 (1.00–10.21)	0.033
Duodenal ulcer	5 (26.3)	16 (18.4)

AEML: Acute esophageal mucosal lesion; RE-D: Reflux esophagitis Los Angeles classification grade D; 95%CI: 95% confidence interval.

Hiatus hernia could not be evaluated in 2 cases in the AEML group (1 in black esophagus, 1 in non-black esophagus) and 1 case in the RE-D group.

Citation: Ichita C, Sasaki A, Shimizu S. Clinical features of acute esophageal mucosal lesions and reflux esophagitis Los Angeles classification grade D: A retrospective study. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15(3): 408-419
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v15/i3/408.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v15.i3.408