Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Dec 27, 2023; 15(12): 2693-2708
Published online Dec 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i12.2693
Table 4 Studies on lymphatic mapping in esophageal and gastric surgery
Ref.
Country
Study type
Patient
Device
ICG dose and time
Surgery
Results
Long term outcome
Esophageal
Hachey et al[48], 2016United StatesProspective PFSEAC: 9NOVADAQ, Stryker2.5 mg/mL, 1 cc, 4 sites, endoscopic injection diluted with sterile water/HSA 25%Ivor Lewis esophagectomy6/9 patients showed 2-6 regional NIR +NA
Park et al[49], 2018KoreaProspective PFSESCC, cT1: 29Firefly, Da Vinci0.5 mg/m, 0.5 m: Each quadrant 1 d priorRobotic Mckeown esophagectomyHigh NPVNA
Stomach
Chen et al[58], 2020ChinaRCTICG 129; non-ICG: 129NOVADAQ, StrykerSubmucosal endoscopic 1 d prior 2 mL, 0.5 mL/quadrant 0.625 mg/mLaparoscopic distal and total gastrectomyLymph node yield, mean ± SD: ICG: 50.5 ± 15.9; non-ICG: 42.0 ± 10.33-yr: DFS: 81.4% vs 68.2%; OS: 86.0% vs 73.6%
Park et al[51], 2020KoreaProspective feasibility study, PSMICG: 20; non-ICG: 60NOVADAQ, StrykerEndoscopic sub-mucosal 0.1 mg/mL, 1 mL 5 sitesLaparoscopic distal gastrectomy, station 6 dissectionICG vs non-CIG lymph node yield 30.15 vs 32.55, bleeding events 4 (20.0) vs 41 (68.3)NA
Cianchi et al[53], 2020ItalyRetrospective, PSMICG: 37; non-ICG: 37Firefly, Da VinciEndoscopic sub-mucosal 0.1 mg/mL, 0.5 mL, 4 quatrantsRobotic distal or total gastrectomyOperative time mean ± SD: 293.1 ± 6 vs 321.2 ± 77.8 harvested lymph nodes: vs 50.8 ± 17NA
Ushimaru et al[52], 2019JapanRetrospective, PSMICG: 84; non-ICG: 84NIR, Karl storzEndoscopic submucosal 0.05 mg/mL, 10 mL, 4 sitesLaparoscopic distal gastrectomyOperative time mean ± SD: 206.1 ± 5.0 vs 237.0 ± 5.0, harvested lymph nodes: 47.5 vs 42.6NA