Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Oct 27, 2023; 15(10): 2280-2293
Published online Oct 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i10.2280
Published online Oct 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i10.2280
Modality | Ref. | Total number of patients | Mean age in years (range) | Gender ratio (M:F) |
PET | Lim et al[11], 2006 | 17 | 51.4 (32-74) | 12:5 |
Sim et al[33], 2009 | 52 | 62 (median) (33-80) | 43:9 | |
Turlakow et al[34], 2003 | 88 | 54 (28-84) | 50:38 | |
Perlaza et al[36], 2018 | 50 | 65.7 ± 12.1 | 30:20 | |
Kim et al[37], 2017 | 60 | 60.6 (29-80) | 16:44 | |
Chen et al[38], 2005 | 68 | 54.8 (28-81) | 49:19 | |
Kim et al[39], 2011 | 139 | 61.5 ± 11.6 | 88:51 | |
MRI | Lin et al[35], 2021 | 62 (11 gastric) | 56 ± 12 (54 ± 13 in gastric) | 20:42 (6:5 in gastric) |
De Vuysere et al[40], 2021 | 32 | (29-85) | 22:10 |
- Citation: Ho SYA, Tay KV. Systematic review of diagnostic tools for peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer-staging laparoscopy and its alternatives. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15(10): 2280-2293
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v15/i10/2280.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v15.i10.2280