Systematic review of diagnostic tools for peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer-staging laparoscopy and its alternatives

Table 3 Statistical results of computed tomography and staging laparoscopy

Ref.	Sensitivity		Specificity		Positive predictive value		Negative predictive value
	CT	Staging laparoscopy	CT	Staging laparoscopy	CT	Staging laparoscopy	CT	Staging laparoscopy
Burbidge et al[28], 2013	25%	-	99%	-	83%	-	82%	-
Li et al[29], 2020	87.5%	-	76.4%	-	31.8%	-	-	-
Davies et al[30], 1997	71%	-	93%	-	67%	-	94%	-
Kim et al[31], 2009	28.3%	-	98.9%	-	-	-	-	-
Asencio et al[58], 1997	0%	88.9%	-	100%	-	100%	-	95.5%
Fujimura et al[59], 2002	38%	86%	100%	100%	67%	92%	-	-
Leeman et al[60], 2017	58.8%	94.1%	89.6%	100%	66.7%	100%	86%	98%
					False positives		False negatives
Stell et al[32], 1996	8%	69%	100%	100%	0%	0%	12%	4%

CT: Computed tomography.