Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Oct 27, 2023; 15(10): 2280-2293
Published online Oct 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i10.2280
Published online Oct 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i10.2280
Ref. | Total number of patients | Mean age in years (range) | Gender ratio (M:F) |
Burbidge et al[28], 2013 | 220 | 69 (41-96) | 136:84 |
Li et al[29], 2020 | 385 | - | - |
Davies et al[30], 1997 | 105 | 69 (33-92) | 68:37 |
Kim et al[31], 2009 | 498 | 59.6 (27-89) | 332:166 |
Stell et al[32], 1996 | 103 | 65 (33-91) | 68:35 |
Asencio et al[58], 1997 | 71 | 65.8 (47-81) | 43:27 |
Fujimura et al[59], 2002 | 39 | (26-80) | 17:22 |
Leeman et al[60], 2017 | 74 | 67.6 (29-84) | 54:20 |
- Citation: Ho SYA, Tay KV. Systematic review of diagnostic tools for peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer-staging laparoscopy and its alternatives. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15(10): 2280-2293
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v15/i10/2280.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v15.i10.2280