Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Oct 27, 2023; 15(10): 2179-2190
Published online Oct 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i10.2179
Published online Oct 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i10.2179
Group | Group A (n = 64) | Group B (n = 64) | t value | P value |
Confront points | ||||
Before intervention | 19.44 ± 2.65 | 18.66 ± 3.11 | 1.528 | 0.129 |
After intervention | 25.98 ± 4.23a | 24.19 ± 3.11a | 2.741 | 0.007 |
Debarb points | ||||
Before intervention | 20.64 ± 4.70 | 20.94 ± 3.97 | 0.386 | 0.700 |
After intervention | 13.00 ± 2.15a | 15.44 ± 2.54a | 5.859 | < 0.001 |
Surrender points | ||||
Before intervention | 12.28 ± 2.51 | 12.84 ± 2.08 | 1.381 | 0.170 |
After intervention | 7.28 ± 1.34a | 9.02 ± 1.46a | 6.994 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Li YD, Qu N, Yang J, Lv CY, Tang Y, Li P. Effects of an Omaha System-based follow-up regimen on self-care and quality of life in gastrointestinal surgery patients. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15(10): 2179-2190
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v15/i10/2179.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v15.i10.2179