Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Oct 27, 2023; 15(10): 2098-2107
Published online Oct 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i10.2098
Table 3 Study comparing laparoscopic and robotic repair of postcholecystectomy biliary stricture
Ref.
Year
Patients
Strasberg injury type
Method of reconstruction
Mean operative time (min)
Blood loss (mL)
Conversion to open
Overall morbidity
Specific complications
Length of stay (d)
Follow up (mo)
Cuendis-Velázquez et al[28]201975 (laparoscopic–40, robotic–35)E1-E5Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomyLaparoscopic–240, Robotic–270Laparoscopic–215, Robotic–1501 patient in laparoscopic group due to dense adhesionsLaparoscopic–27.5, Robotic–22.8Bile leak, laparoscopic–2 patients, robotic–1 patient, one patient in each group underwent laparotomy, lavage with additional drain placement for bile leakLaparoscopic–7, Robotic–6Laparoscopic–49, anastomotic patency rate–92.5%, robotic–16, anastomotic patency rate–100%