Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jan 27, 2023; 15(1): 9-18
Published online Jan 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i1.9
Published online Jan 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i1.9
Ablation modalities | Advantages | Limitations |
RFA[13,14] | Most widely used and mature technology | Limited zone of monopolar centrifugal ablation |
Multibipolar RFA for larger and more modulable ablation zones | Sensitive to heat sink effect | |
Influenced by tissue conductance | ||
MWA[13,14] | Higher temperature and faster heating of larger target over RFA | Complex and technically demanding operation |
Less sensitive to heat sink effect | Thermal injury from higher temperature | |
Less influenced by tissue conductance | ||
PEI[42] | Simple to perform, inexpensive | Small size of ablation zone |
Chemo-ablation: No thermal injury | High local recurrence rate | |
HIFU[47] | Noninvasive operation: No worry of needle tract seeding | Time consuming |
Influenced by ultrasoundpropagation and artifacts, respiration motion | ||
CRA[13,48] | Less pain | High cost |
Well-visualized ice ball on imaging for precise monitoring | Cryoshock (more often in early device) | |
IRE[13,14] | Nonthermal ablation: low risk of thermal injury | Risk of myoclonia and arrhythmias |
Less sensitive to heat-sink effect | Limited clinical data | |
Well preserved connective tissue, blood vessels and bile ducts | ||
Less frequent liver failure |
- Citation: Cong R, Ma XH, Wang S, Feng B, Cai W, Chen ZW, Zhao XM. Application of ablative therapy for intrahepatic recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma following hepatectomy. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15(1): 9-18
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v15/i1/9.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v15.i1.9