Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Sep 27, 2022; 14(9): 986-996
Published online Sep 27, 2022. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i9.986
Published online Sep 27, 2022. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i9.986
Table 3 Diagnostic efficiency of magnifying endoscope or endoscopic ultrasound in dividing specific invasion layer
| EP/LPM | MM/SM1 | SM2/SM3 | |||||||
| ME, % | EUS, % | P value | ME, % | EUS, % | P value | ME, % | EUS, % | P value | |
| Sensitivity | 84.60 | 73.10 | 0.08 | 92.90% | 35.7 | < 0.01 | 41.30 | 73.90 | < 0.01 |
| Specificity | 91.90 | 81.10 | 0.06 | 73.40% | 91.10 | < 0.01 | 98.10 | 75.40 | < 0.01 |
| Accuracy | 88.20 | 77.00 | < 0.01 | 77.00% | 80.90 | 0.51 | 80.90 | 75.00 | 0.22 |
- Citation: Zeng YT, Sun YY, Tan WC, Luo SA, Zou BH, Luo GY, Huang CY. Study of preoperative diagnostic modalities in Chinese patients with superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. World J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 14(9): 986-996
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v14/i9/986.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v14.i9.986