Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Sep 27, 2022; 14(9): 1060-1071
Published online Sep 27, 2022. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i9.1060
Published online Sep 27, 2022. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i9.1060
Table 6 Wound infection: Data standard deviation in the meta-analysis
Ref. | Standard deviation | Proportion (%) | 95%CI |
Our experience | 821 | 0.244 | 0.0295-0.877 |
Van Rossem et al[30], 2017 | 1050 | 1.524 | 0.873-2.463 |
Sadat-Safavi et al[19], 2016 | 38 | 2.632 | 0.0666-13.810 |
Swank et al[31], 2014 | 465 | 1.505 | 0.607-3.077 |
Sahm et al[29], 2011 | 1670 | 2.036 | 1.414-2.833 |
Beldi et al[26], 2006 | 2565 | 0.468 | 0.242-0.816 |
Klima et al[47], 1998 | 100 | 3.000 | 0.623-8.518 |
Ortega et al[9], 1995 | 89 | 4.494 | 1.238-11.109 |
Total (fixed effects) | 6798 | 1.064 | 0.834-1.337 |
Total (random effects) | 6798 | 1.496 | 0.759-2.475 |
- Citation: Zorzetti N, Lauro A, Bellini MI, Vaccari S, Dalla Via B, Cervellera M, Cirocchi R, Sorrenti S, D’Andrea V, Tonini V. Laparoscopic appendectomy, stump closure and endoloops: A meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 14(9): 1060-1071
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v14/i9/1060.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v14.i9.1060