Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Sep 27, 2022; 14(9): 1049-1059
Published online Sep 27, 2022. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i9.1049
Table 2 Details and results of the endoscopic repair approaches for rectovaginal fistulas
Number
Endoscopic repair
Operative time (min) and hospital-stay (d)
Follow-up (mo)
Resultsa
Complication
1TEMS + fistulectomy + suturing (n = 13)130 min (range, 90-150 min); 5 d (range, 3-8 d)2593% closedHematoma of the septum (n = 1); Abscess of the septum (n = 1); Moderate sphincter hypotonia (n = 1)
2Endoscopic stenting (n = 15)Unclear; Unclear22 (range, 4-39)80% closedPain (n = 1); Too uncomfortable to tolerate the stent (n = 1)
3TEMS + fistulectomy + suturing (n = 4); TEMS + RAF (n = 1)Unclear; Unclear5 (range, 1-68)40% closedNo complication
4TEMS + VAF (n = 6); TEMS exploration + VAF (n = 6); TEMS + transvaginal suturing (n = 3); TES exploration + transvaginal suturing (n = 2)75 min (range, 60-120 min); 8.29 d (range, 2-24 d)8 (range, 2-24)82.4% closedNo complication
5OTSCs (n = 16)Unclear; Unclear10.2 (range, 8-36)43.7% closedPain (n = 4); Spontaneous clip detachment (n = 1)
6Endoscopic injection of fibrin glue (n = 1)Few min; 0 d12Closed successfullyNo complication
7TEMS + RAF (n = 1)Unclear; 2 d6Closed successfullyNo complication
8TTSCs (n = 1)Unclear; Unclear12Closed successfullyMinimal flatus from vaginal (n = 1)
9TEMS + suturing (n = 1)125 min; 7d12Closed successfullyNo complication
10TEMS + stratified suturing (n = 1)40 min; 2 d12Closed successfullyNo complication
11TTSCs (n = 1)Unclear; Unclear13Closed successfullyNo complication