3D laparoscopic-assisted vs open gastrectomy for carcinoma in the remnant stomach: A retrospective cohort study

doi:10.4240/wjgs.v14.i8.754

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 14, Issue 8

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (2268)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-2) series, Tables (1-3) series.

Item

Count

PDF

123

WORD

HTML

1089

Figures (1-2)

213

Tables (1-3)

187

Sum=1658

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

201

Download

409

Sum=610

Aug 27, 2022 (publication date) through Aug 24, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (3)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

ISSN

1948-9366

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Retrospective Cohort Study

World J Gastrointest Surg. Aug 27, 2022; 14(8): 754-764
Published online Aug 27, 2022. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i8.754

Table 1 Demographic and clinicopathological characteristics for patients in two cohorts

	OG (n = 48)	3DLAG (n = 36)	P value
Age (yr)	60.62 (10.11)	61.19 (9.90)	0.797
Gender (%)			1.000
Male	42 (87.5)	32 (88.9)
Female	6 (12.5)	4 (11.1)
BMI (kg/m²)	21.65 (3.22)	22.26 (2.59)	0.355
ASA (%)			0.384
1	1 (2.1)	0 (0.0)
2	33 (68.8)	29 (80.6)
3	14 (29.2)	7 (19.4)
Previous disease (%)			0.54
Benign	17 (35.4)	16 (44.4)
Malignant	31 (64.6)	20 (55.6)
Primary reconstruction (%)			0.617
Billroth Ⅰ	16 (33.3)	12 (33.3)
Billroth Ⅱ	22 (45.8)	20 (55.6)
Roux-en-Y	4 (8.3)	1 (2.8)
Tube-like Stomach esophagogastrostomy	6 (12.5)	3 (8.3)
Interval time (d)	211.56 (197.35)	237.97 (209.01)	0.556
Site of CRS (%)			0.352
Non-anastomosis	22 (45.8)	12 (33.3)
Anastomosis	26 (54.2)	66.7)

All continuous variables were described by mean ± SD; enumeration data were presented by percentage (%). OGC: Open gastrectomy for carcinoma in the remnant stomach; 3DLAGC: 3D laparoscopic assisted gastrectomy for carcinoma in the remnant stomach; BMI: Body mass index; CRS: Carcinoma in the remnant stomach.

Citation: Wu D, Song QY, Li XG, Xie TY, Lu YX, Zhang BL, Li S, Wang XX. 3D laparoscopic-assisted vs open gastrectomy for carcinoma in the remnant stomach: A retrospective cohort study. World J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 14(8): 754-764
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v14/i8/754.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v14.i8.754