Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Mar 27, 2022; 14(3): 236-246
Published online Mar 27, 2022. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i3.236
Table 2 Patient characteristics of patients with and without common bile duct stone recurrence, n (%)
Characteristics
Recurrence (n = 43)
Nonrecurrence (n = 459)
P value
Sex (male/female)23/20264/1950.61
Age ≥ 70 yr25 (58.1)176 (38.3)0.01
PAD23 (53.5)220 (47.9)0.49
CBD diameter (mean ± SD, cm)1.5 ± 0.51.3 ± 0.70.06
CBD diameter ≥ 1.5 cm23 (53.5)137 (29.8)< 0.01
Largest CBD stone diameter ≥ 1.5 cm11 (25.6)71 (15.5)0.09
CBD stone number ≥ 215 (34.9)174 (37.9)0.70
Muddy stones12 (27.9)119 (25.9)0.78
Initial ampullary intervention
EST13 (30.2)128 (27.9)0.74
EPBD/EPLBD9 (20.9)22 (4.8)< 0.01
ESBD17 (39.5)298 (64.9)< 0.01
CBD morphology< 0.01
Straight type14 (32.6)275 (59.9)
S type11 (25.6)34 (7.4)
Polyline type18 (41.9)150 (32.7)
Cholecystectomy 5 (11.6)21 (4.6)0.06
Procedure time (mean ± SD, min)19.3 ± 14.220.1 ± 13.60.71
Gastrectomy3 (7.0)6 (1.3)0.03