Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Mar 27, 2022; 14(3): 221-235
Published online Mar 27, 2022. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i3.221
Published online Mar 27, 2022. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i3.221
Table 3 Comparison of complication rates between the two groups, n (%)
| Item | CMA group (n= 26) | MA group (n= 31) | P value |
| Complications | 6(23) | 4(13) | 0.486 |
| Anastomotic fistula | 0 | 0 | |
| Anastomotic stenosis | 0 | 0 | |
| Bleeding | 0 | 1 | |
| Lymphatic fistula | 3 | 1 | |
| Ileus | 2 | 0 | |
| Incisional hernia | 0 | 1 | |
| Acute urine retention | 0 | 0 | |
| Incision infection prevention | 1 | 1 | |
| Intra-abdominal infection | 0 | 0 | |
| Pulmonary infection | 0 | 0 |
- Citation: Lin L, Yuan SB, Guo H. Does cranial-medial mixed dominant approach have a unique advantage for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision? World J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 14(3): 221-235
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v14/i3/221.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v14.i3.221