Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Mar 27, 2022; 14(3): 221-235
Published online Mar 27, 2022. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i3.221
Published online Mar 27, 2022. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i3.221
Item | CMA group (n= 26) | MA group (n= 31) | P value |
Age (yr) | 63.12 ± 13.65 | 61.35 ± 12.27 | 0.61 |
Sex | 0.794 | ||
Male | 14 | 18 | |
Female | 12 | 13 | |
BMI (kg/m2) | 21.42 ± 3.15 | 22.54 ± 3.43 | 0.209 |
Tumour size (cm) | 5.18 ± 1.80 | 4.84 ± 2.06 | 0.52 |
Previous abdominal surgery | 0.488 | ||
Yes | 3 | 6 | |
No | 23 | 25 | |
Tumour location | 0.644 | ||
Ileocecal junction | 7 | 6 | |
Ascending colon | 11 | 12 | |
Flexura hepatica coli | 8 | 13 | |
Histological grade | 0.185 | ||
Well | 0 | 1 | |
Moderate | 18 | 26 | |
Poor | 8 | 4 |
- Citation: Lin L, Yuan SB, Guo H. Does cranial-medial mixed dominant approach have a unique advantage for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision? World J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 14(3): 221-235
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v14/i3/221.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v14.i3.221