Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Feb 27, 2022; 14(2): 185-199
Published online Feb 27, 2022. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i2.185
Table 1 Endoscopic closure and occlusion techniques for the treatment of leaks and fistulas after bariatric surgery
Endoscopic technique
Indications/advantages
Not indicated/disadvantages
Our experience
Glues (Closure)(1) Acute/early/late/chronic; (2) Low-debit (< 200 mL/24 h); (3) Diameter < 10 mm; and (4) Safe(1) Multiple sessions are usually required; (2) High costs; (3) Need for external drainage; and (4) Variable efficacy(1) Low efficacy; (2) Multiple sessions; (3) High costs; (4) Late/chronic; (5) Combined approach; and (6) Can be used in select cases
Cap-mounted clips (Closure)(1) Acute/early/late/chronic; (2) Small orifices (< 2 cm); and (3) Safe(1) > 2 cm orifice; (2) Need for external drainage; and (3) Variable efficacy(1) Low efficacy; (2) Late/chronic; and (3) Can be used in select cases
Suturing (Closure)(1) Acute/early/late/chronic; and (2) Safe(1) Need for external drainage; (2) Challenging-need previous experience with the device; (3) Low efficacy; and (4) High cost(1) High cost; (2) Very poor long-term clinical success; and (3) We do not recommend it!
Stents (conventional esophageal or specific design for LSG) (over)(1) Acute and early; (2) Very popular; (3) Efficacy > 70%; (4) Conventional = bariatric stent; (5) Early oral intake; and (6) Lower number of repeat procedures(1) High rates of migration (up to 30%); (2) Need for external drainage; (3) Symptoms related to the stent; (4) Late and Chronic; and (5) You may have a “surprise” when remove it(1) High rates of migration; (2) Partially covered > fully-covered (challenging to remove-do not keep it for more than 3 wk!); and (3) Bariatric stents: Similar efficacy, more SAE; Symptoms related to the stent (pre pyloric); More migration (post pyloric); We´re avoiding stents, specially Bariatric Stents
Cardiac septal defect occlude (Cover)(1) Late and chronic; (2) Efficacy > 95%; and (3) Safe(1) Off-label use; (2) Acute and Early; (3) High cost; and (4) Need for external drainage(1) High efficacy in late/chronic fistulas with epithelialized tract without associated collection; (2) Safe; and (3) Good option after failure of conventional techniques